Devoted to Managers and those that seek to improve their management skills

Global warming hoax update 

The "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)," created by the United Nations and World Meteorological Organization over 20 years ago was for the alleged "comprehensive, objective, scientific, technical and socioeconomic assessment of human-caused climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation," said H. Sterling Burnett in the Washington Times.

Now after real scientists have examined the way the IPCC has gone about their research, they're looking more like the scientific version of the keystone cops, rather than a serious body of scientists.

Before getting into some of the scientific shortcomings, the breaking of the rule of the IPCC making forecasts independent of politics is laughable. If nothing else, the IPCC is a group of scientists appointed by diplomats, legislators and policymakers; specifically the lead scientists asserts Burnett.

Even worse, the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC (summary and final draft) was written together with and subject to the approval of political appointees. That in itself should disqualify them as objective participants; which it increasingly is as news is getting out on the dirt behind all this.

With that in mind, here are some of the shortcomings of the keystone cops scientists on the IPCC:

Faulty Methodology

They used the wrong time scale
Thus results showed a lower mean temperature
That made temperatures look like they were rising more than they were when measured against the last century.

What does that mean? The IPCC didn't even use the right time scale to measure the temperatures against. The reason why? Statisticians weren't even invited to participate; the reason they say the error wasn't even discovered.

It makes you seriously question whether they wanted the input of others.

Specialist in ancient climates

These were drawn from a small group
Many had ties to original authors of global warming report
Connected to lead researcher who coauthored papers

Conclusion of George Mason University team:

"The idea that the planet is experiencing unprecedented global warming 'cannot be supported.'"

There's even more!

The Fourth Assessment Report in 2007, which predicted the "immenent" global warming disaster, didn't even include accurate temperature statistics.

Here's why:

Many large portions of the world don't even measure temperatures.

Weather stations now surrounded by pavement and building which trap heat, given off false results. It's like measuring the surrounding temperature in a greenhouse and then applying it to the rest of the georaphic area.

Weren't even aware of or hardly used 140 established forecasting principles

Those who provide forecasting in a number of disciplines, which includes science, have put together 104 principles over the years used to measure where things may go.

A study by the NCPA of the IPCC report found that this group of people obviously violated 60 of the 127 principled that were relevant to the IPCC study.

Even with the benefit of the doubt, the NCPA study found the IPCC only followed 17 of those principles.

Kesten Green and J. Scott Armstrong who headed the audit of the IPCC forecasters, found not only didn't they follow the principles, but the it looks like the reason they didn't was because they didn't even know they existed. In other words, even the 17 principles they followed evidently were done by dumb luck.

The only argument the IPCC can come up with is only a climate scientist is qualified to judge whether their work is valid or not. That's like saying only an NFL quarterback can tell if he made a good pass or not, or only a runner can make the decision if other runners run a race well.

What they're really saying, is how dare someone question our decisions. We dare. With the consequences of implementing measures to fight a phantom issue, we better examine where all this is leading, and take all input into account before going down this rabbit hole.

The more information made available, the more this is looking like a politically motivated non-issue emerging from the dying European Union.

So sleep well at night, this bogey man doesn't exist, and real science is confirming that on an ongoing basis.

Another Global Warming Hoax exposed - Released by AP on day United Nations released major Global Warming report: Two years after it was taken in summer!

Related stories

Weather Channel Founder: Sue Al Gore for Fraud

Beware the politician posing as a scientist