Devoted to Managers and those that seek to improve their management skills

Staggering Implications and running for cover by proponents - Global Warming Hoax confirmed by NASA satellite data.

Co-host of Counterpoint Michael Duffy, recently interviewed Jennifer Marohasy, who is a "biologist and senior fellow of Melbourne-based think tank the Institute of Public Affairs." The interview took place on ABC Radio National.

When Duffy asked Marohasy: "Is the Earth still warming?"

Her response was: "No, actually, there has been cooling, if you take 1998 as your point of reference. If you take 2002 as your point of reference, then temperatures have plateaued. This is certainly not what you'd expect if carbon dioxide is driving temperature because carbon dioxide levels have been increasing but temperatures have actually been coming down over the last 10 years." 
 
After the reply, you would expect the follow up question to have been answered in the affirmative, but it wasn't. Duffy asked Marohasy if the question had controversy in any way connected to it. Her response surprised me, as I expected the usual counterpoint to put down the findings.

Even more shocking, the head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) even has come to acknowledge that since 1998 these temperature results are true.

Both Duffy and Harohasy said it's something that definitely needs to be discussed because of the tremendous ramifications that the computer models which have been used to predict global warming are now confirmed to be faulty and not trustworthy.

What's tipped the scales?

It's not just the usual bantering about of each sides viewpoints or theories any longer, there is much more solid evidence now in place that demolishes the global warming hoax once and for all. It's NASA's Aqua satellite that has brought the theory down.

Duffy asked Marohasy about the NASA satellite being one of the key sources for new data brought into the conversation about how the climate works.

She responded saying:  What all the climate models suggest is that, when you've got warming from additional carbon dioxide, this will result in increased water vapour, so you're going to get a positive feedback. That's what the models have been indicating. What this great data from the NASA Aqua satellite ... (is) actually showing is just the opposite, that with a little bit of warming, weather processes are compensating, so they're actually limiting the greenhouse effect and you're getting a negative rather than a positive feedback."

What does that mean? The climate models used to project the warming trends that the doomsayers have been preaching, have been found to have underestimated the strength of the climate, which has thrown the models completely off.

Marohasy added that the meteorological community isn't challenging the data, and accepts it as accurate, and even admits that the data from the NASA satellite contradicts the projections of the climate models used to project the global warming future that has been wrongly hyped.

Finally, Marohasy said that not only is the data being accepted as true, but the interpretation by Roy Spencer, who is a climate scientist has been accepted as well. She said people are "still in shock at this point."

I'm not going to be so nice about this hoax that was attempted to be purpetrated upon the peoples of the world at extraordinary cost to their well being. This is why the frantic push to get treaties signed and agreements in place have been going on so strongly in the media and political circles behind the scenes and in public.

This is why you heard the alarmists sounding the warning that we may only have a few years left to save planet earth. They even had the guts to declare that the global warming debate was over, and we had to take drastic measures to counter the devastation about to come upon the planet. Screw them!

This is what Marohasy meant by the meteorological and scientific community was in shock. Now they're scramling to figure out how to get out of this unbelievable, but very satisfying trap they've put themselves in. It'll be fun to see them attempt to explain their way out of this debacle, and their professional credibility they so eloquently put on the line, while viciously attempting to silence and censure their opponents; who were actually right.

They're right about one thing: the global warming debate is over, and there is no global warming. So go ahead and extend your carbon footprint, the earth is able to handle it. Viva la carbon!

Ah, Mr. Gore, you can now return the Nobel Peace Prize you should have never received.