
An interesting op-ed piece by Norman Pearlstine in the Los Angeles Times talks about the failure of many newspapers and magazines to have a high standard of editorial independence. He even talks about the failure of the New York Times (NYT) to cover its parent company the New York Times Co. in any meaningful way.
Pearlstine is only able to name one executive, Jerry Levin, whom he considers truly to have been committed to editorially independence.
He goes on to mention the hypocrisy of the Bancroft family in relationship to the Wall Street Journal and the News Corp. (NWS-A) negotiations over editorial independence. He says, "... its moral position is undermined by the failure to demand rigorous coverage of its own company over the last 50 years." Pearlstine was managing editor of the Wall Street Journal from 1983 to 1991.
In a number of stinging rebukes to the overall industry, he comes to the conclusion that with the exception of Levin, Murdoch has no role models to look to that have truly supported editorial independence.
So that leads to the question of why Murdoch is being held to higher standards than the Bancrofts have been willing to institute themselves, and the overall industry as well.
More and more it's looking like it's because of his conservative leanings rather than any other bogus reason that's been proffered by his enemies.
The very ones attacking him aren't living by the standards that they're attempting to throw on Murdoch, including the Bancroft family that's acting like they've been living by them as well, when in reality they haven't.
The problem with the Bancrofts is they ran the company as absentee owners, not because they believed in editorial independence, but because they really didn't have much interest in the company. That's why there hasn't been a rigorous look at Dow Jones from within over the years. Yet they want Murdoch to have to start living in a way that they never did.
The truth is anyone that would buy the company would run it according to the way they run their existing media businesses. And according to Pearlstine, it's no different than Murdoch or anyone else is at the moment.
Related Coverage:
Dow Jones says Story about Completed Deal with Murdoch False
Wall Street Journal Editor Supports Dow Jones, News Corp. Agreement
New York Times Article says if Murdoch buys Wall Street Journal, Dark Day for American Democracy
What the Real Battle over Dow Jones is About
Rupert Murdoch Retains Power to Hire and Fire at Wall Street Journal
Dow Jones, News Corp. Come to Editorial Board Agreement
Dow Jones Deal Coming Closer to a Conclusion
Latest Plan by Bancrofts Shows Board may be Just Rubber Stamp for Them
Dow Jones Board Drafting "Editorial Independence" Statement - Will Murdoch Accept?
Remember to Sign up for my feed, bizzbite and digg this!
Sponsored link: The outsourcing every manager requires - Tampa Locksmith








» Ron Burkle Finally being Brought into Dow Jones Soap Opera from ManagersRealm
Continuing Coverage of the Dow Jones StoryA long time after being named as a potential suitor of Dow Jones (DJ), Ron Burkle has been invited to meet with the board to see if there is any favorable options for the... [Read More]
Tracked on: July 8, 2007 10:50 PM | Permalink to Trackback